How to get a Google Knowledge Panel (step-by-step guide)

Photo by Firmbee.com on Unsplash

Opinions expressed by Digital Journal contributors are their own.

In the current era of digital marketing, possessing a Google Knowledge Panel (GKP) is a mark of authority and visibility in the virtual realm. It’s a powerful tool for any business or personal brand eager to enhance its online stature. A Google Knowledge Panel not only boosts discoverability on Google searches but also communicates to potential clients or followers that the brand is noteworthy and established.

Nevertheless, navigating the intricacies of obtaining a Google Knowledge Panel can appear daunting. The creation and activation of a GKP for a specific brand requires a blend of precise SEO strategies and careful content management, alongside a thorough grasp of Google’s complex algorithms. However, there’s no need to worry.

This comprehensive guide, crafted by the experts over at Maximatic Media, provides all the essential steps needed to establish, optimize, and activate a Google Knowledge Panel for your specific brand and relevant keywords. Let’s delve right into it.

Understanding notability for Google Knowledge Panels

The essence of notability in GKP formation 

When initiating the journey to establish a Google Knowledge Panel, grasping the concept of notability is crucial and often serves as the cornerstone of the entire process. Notability, within the realm of GKPs, is gauged by the frequency and quality of mentions by authoritative, secondary sources in their publications. These mentions can vary widely, from in-depth feature articles dedicated solely to the entity, to brief mentions in a compilation or simple citations. However, the impact of these references is not uniform; their influence largely depends on both the depth of the coverage and the credibility of the source. For instance, a detailed article in a prestigious magazine like Forbes generally holds more sway than a brief mention in a lesser-known blog.

Comprehensiveness of references 

Focusing on comprehensiveness, the value of a reference is assessed based on several criteria: the length of the article, the frequency of the entity’s name throughout the text, and the presence of the entity in the article’s headline. These elements collectively contribute to the weight the reference carries, with more comprehensive coverage generally enhancing the entity’s prominence in Google’s view. For example, a comprehensive, 750-word article about the entity on a high-profile site like Forbes is more influential than a shorter, 100-word mention in a listicle, even if it was published on the same site.

Topical relevance and its impact 

Topical relevance is another critical factor in establishing notability. It’s important that the content of the reference aligns with the general narrative surrounding the entity across various publications. If the mentions are inconsistent or overly broad, it can dilute Google’s understanding of the entity, potentially harming the entity’s portrayal in the Knowledge Panel. This is why strategically planned brand mentions and thoughtful keyword integration in relevant guest posts are preferable, as haphazard or irrelevant mentions can mislead Google’s perception of what the entity represents, often to its detriment.

Evaluating reputability and domain authority in influencing notability

Defining reputability

After exploring the importance of comprehensiveness, it’s essential to examine reputability, another key element that enhances the effectiveness of media coverage. Reputability is relatively straightforward—well-known media outlets like Forbes, Mashable, and VentureBeat are typically considered reputable by Google. These platforms provide substantial coverage that can affirm a brand’s prominence and help meet the criteria necessary for obtaining a Google Knowledge Panel. However, the cost associated with securing a full feature article on these sites can be steep: $15,000 on Forbes, $2,400 on Mashable, and $12,000 on VentureBeat. If the primary goal is merely to trigger a Google Knowledge Panel, these investments might not always represent the best value.

The importance of domain authority 

Here, Domain Authority (DA) serves as a critical metric. DA scores range from 1 to 100 and are determined based on factors like a domain’s age, the number of backlinks, and the quality of these links. This score helps gauge a site’s relative authority on the internet. For instance, Forbes has a DA of 95, while Mashable and VentureBeat have DAs of 92 and 93, respectively. Although all three are highly esteemed, the disparity in their advertising costs raises questions about the actual value each brings relative to their price, especially when considering the specific goal of enhancing perceived notability in the SERPs for GKP purposes.

Strategic considerations for media placements 

Reviewing the list of media outlets on Maximatic Media’s PR for small businesses service page, whilst keeping a close eye on the DA score of each available media outlet, can offer insights into more cost-effective options. Many Google-News-Approved sites such as Village Voice, HackerNoon, Times of Malta, and Chiang Rai Times, though not as prestigious as Forbes, still possess high DAs and come at a fraction of the cost. In the pursuit of a Google Knowledge Panel, opting for multiple placements in these B-tier publications could be more beneficial than a single placement in a top-tier site. This approach not only ensures a spread of reputable mentions but also aligns with a strategic use of resources, maximizing the impact within the Google Ecosystem through Schema.org structured data. By focusing on a diversified set of reputable sources, brands can significantly enhance their likelihood of securing a Knowledge Panel efficiently and effectively.

Required number of references needed for getting a Google Knowledge Panel

One of the frequent queries Maximatic Media encounters in their client consultations pertaining to their Google Knowledge Panel service is the number of references needed to ensure activation. Precisely determining this figure is challenging due to the opaque nature of Google’s internal algorithms, which remain a closely guarded secret. The algorithms are dynamic, varying significantly across different cases, which means there is no definitive number that guarantees success. Some clients have successfully triggered a GKP with as few as three mid-tier references, while others have not achieved one despite having over 20 robust references.

Through an analysis of various successful instances, a practical target to consider is approximately eight semi-strong references, each with a Domain Authority (DA) of 70 or higher. This number isn’t absolute but serves as a general guideline. Factors such as “keyword-pollution” — where multiple entities compete for recognition under the same brand name — can influence the necessary quantity of references.

Clarifying the Wikipedia — Google Knowledge Panel connection 

A prevalent misconception is that possessing a Wikipedia page is essential for triggering a Google Knowledge Panel. However, this is not the case. While having a Wikipedia page can facilitate the addition of a concise biography in the Knowledge Panel, it is not mandatory for the panel’s creation. The correlation between Wikipedia entries and GKPs does exist mainly because both are recognized by Google as credible sources, but a Wikipedia page is not a prerequisite.

Creating a Wikipedia page involves stringent editorial standards and can be more challenging than obtaining a GKP. Unless there’s a specific requirement for a Wikipedia page to enhance a company’s credibility or image, pursuing one solely for the sake of a Knowledge Panel might not justify the effort involved. For those considering this route, Maximatic Media’s Wikipedia publishing service provides insights into the significant differences in requirements between setting up a Wikipedia page and securing a GKP.

Implementing Schema.org for Google Knowledge Panel optimization

The role of Schema.org in Google Knowledge Panel creation

After exploring the concept of notability, another pivotal aspect of setting up a Google Knowledge Panel is the implementation of Schema.org. Initiated by major search engines like Google, Schema.org was designed to establish a common vocabulary for webmasters to use in organizing metadata on their sites. Employing this type of microdata—a specific HTML specification—allows for embedding metadata within the content already present on web pages. When applied correctly, Schema markup can dramatically enhance visibility in Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs), making the website’s content more comprehensible to search engines.

Step-by-step guide to Schema.org markup implementation 

To effectively utilize Schema markup in fostering a Google Knowledge Panel, here’s a concise guide:

1. Identify your Schema type: Select the appropriate Schema.org type that matches your content. There are numerous options available, from those suited to organizations and individuals to those for places, events, and creative works.
2. Generate your markup: Utilize tools like Google’s Structured Data Markup Helper or a JSON-LD Schema Generator. These tools offer a user-friendly, step-by-step process to create the necessary markup.
3. Implement your markup: Integrate the generated markup into your website’s HTML. The specific location within the HTML will depend on the type of Schema used and the configuration of the website’s content management system.
4. Test your markup: After adding the markup to your website, use tools like Google’s Rich Results Test to ensure it is correctly implemented and interpretable by Google.

While adding Schema.org markup is not a guaranteed pathway to achieving a Knowledge Panel, it significantly bolsters the odds by aiding Google in more accurately understanding and depicting the website’s content.

Concluding insights on Google Knowledge Panel creation 

In conclusion, the pursuit of a Google Knowledge Panel is a multifaceted process that combines detailed technical skill, strategic content deployment, and sometimes, an element of luck. The strategy includes not only enhancing the visibility of a brand through thoughtful media placements but also ensuring that each placement is cost-effective and relevant.

There is no set number of references that can guarantee the activation of a Knowledge Panel. The focus should be on the quality and strategic significance of each reference. Additionally, while a Wikipedia page can contribute positively, it is not a prerequisite unless it aligns with broader branding and credibility strategies.

For those in need of expert guidance or professional services to obtain a Google Knowledge Panel, Maximatic Media offers tailored solutions designed to enhance both personal and corporate brands in Google’s Search Engine Results Pages. Their extensive expertise is available through their blog and detailed service offerings dedicated to Knowledge Panel creation. For anyone looking to establish or enhance their online presence through a Google Knowledge Panel, engaging with Maximatic Media’s Google Knowledge Panel service could be a significant step forward.